Nestle violates UN resolutions by Launching its new BabyNes feeding system in Switzerland

Share this


Baby Milk Action press release 25 May 2011 (also see Campaign blog: Nestlé's brave new world)

Nestlé is embarking on a new violation of World Health Assembly marketing requirements for breastmilk substitutes after refusing earlier this month to stop the vast majority of violations in the latest global monitoring report, presented in Geneva.

Nestlé is press releasing and publicising  a new baby bottle  feeding preparation system, BabyNes in an idealising and misleading way, describing it as: "The first comprehensive nutrition system for babies."    The World Health Organisation recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life, followed by continued breastfeeding into the second year of life alongside complementary food. The International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes and subsequent, relevant Resolutions of the World Health Assembly forbid the  promotion of all  breastmilk substitutes including formulas,  feeding bottles and teats  in ALL countries - a fact that Nestlé and all the baby food  companies ignore, abiding by the rules only when forced to do so by national legislation or when publicly exposed.  


The new product clearly aims to increase Nestlé's profits from products which already have one of the highest markups on the supermarket shelves.

WHO GuidanceNestlé says the ‘state-of-the-art technology’ is based on its Nespresso coffee machine, stressing its convenience and safety but playing down the inherent risks which relate not only to the shortcomings in the formula itself, but to the water, the bottles, teats and to the many problems caused by not breastfeeding. (1) The system does not follow WHO guidance (right) which requires all water - even bottled water -  to be boiled before being added to powdered infant formula  at no less than 70 degrees C.  This important decontamination step is needed  because powdered formulas may be intrinsically contaminated with harmful pathogens, such as Enterobacter sakazakii (2) or Salmonella enterica serotype agona. 

Such a complicated system  - like the Nespresso machine - seems also to need a 24-hour after sales service  - assuring Nestlé contact with mothers  - something that is totally forbidden by the World Health Assembly requirements which also warn that  infant feeding information should be free from conflicts of interest.  (3)


Patti Rundall, OBE, Policy Director of Baby Milk Action, says:  







“If this new very expensive and environmentally wasteful system was an important advance in consumer safety - Nestle should provide health workers with scientific and factual information which would enable them to properly evaluate its benefits or risks. Instead Nestle promotes it in press releases, on its website, in YouTube adverts and on Facebook,  so that it is picked up worldwide. The claim that it provides the “utmost safety and convenience and is the first comprehensive nutrition system for babies” - is absurd.  This role has been carried out by mothers  far more safely and effectively since the human race began.   It would have far more impact on the health of babies - including those fed on formula  - if Nestlé stopped using promotional claims and brought its product labels into line with WHO requirements. This means warnings and instructions that alert parents to the many inherent risks of artificial feeding - including pointing out that powdered formula is not a sterile product that may contain bacteria.  The powder in the capsule should be added to water at 70degrees. How can this be done and cooled in one minute?”  





IBFAN's monitoring shows that Nestle continues to systematically violate the UN requirements  all over the world unless there are laws in place to stop it.  In response to the latest report, launched earlier this month,  Nestle said it would stop only 4 of the highlighted examples (and only then after supporters of the Nestlé boycott had sent it thousands of emails), clearly  indicating that it is intending to continue with 97% of the rest of the violations.


The latest State of the Code chart from IBFAN shows 67 countries have introduced legislation, but where this is lacking or ineffective companies should still abide by the Code.   This promotion is clearly illegal in countries such as India which has fully implemented the Code and where a leading bottle and teat company has already been taken to court for press releasing information about its own ‘innovative’ feeding bottle and later pulled out of the market. 


This week, Save the Children Australia, Oxfam, Care  and 13 other Aid agencies working in Laos wrote  a letter  to Nestlé, about  the company's  continued marketing  of formula  which "still jeopardizes the health of infants and children in Laos." 

For more information contact:

Patti Rundall +44 (0) 7786 523493 

Mike Brady +44 (0) 7986 736179


Media coverage:


The Guardian:







HUFFINGTON POSTNestle Unveils BabyNes, A Nespresso-Style Machine For Baby Milk



PSFK (New York)

Muy Interesanto

POPSOP (Russia


CARE 2 Blog


Revolution Daily News


 World Crunch



User Manual for NesBaby:

NesBaby Advert

1 Risks of Formula feeding  - a Brief Annotated Bibliography by INFACT CANADA

Scientific Evidence of the Risks of not being breastfed.

2 Such contamination is intrinsic to the powdered formulas  and was found in14% of tins of formula in a study cited by the US Food and Drugs Administration. Nestlé is well aware of such risks as it had to recall tins of formula across Europe in 2002 following the death of a child attributed to such contamination. This was one of the deaths that led to the WHO guidance available at:

Two consecutive large outbreaks of Salmonella enterica serotype agona infections in infants linked to the consumption of powdered infant formula.  Brouard et al, The Pediatric infectious disease journal 2007, vol. 26, no2, pp. 148-152 [5 page(s) (article)] (26 ref.)

 This French study states that: "Powdered infant formulas are not sterile products and may contain low levels of Salmonella. Routine biological controls are insufficient to detect a low grade of contamination, which may cause serious illness and outbreaks among infants"

3 Article 5.5 of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutesstates: "Marketing personnel, in their business capacity, should not seek direct or indirect contact of any kind with pregnant women or with mothers of infants and young children."

 3 World Health Assembly Resolution WHA 49.15 1996 urges Member States to 

ensure that: "financial support for professionals working in infant and young child health does not create conflicts of interest."

World Health Assembly Resolution WHA58.32  2005  urges Member States:

1.4 "to ensure that financial support and other incentives for programmes and health professionals working in infant and young child health do not create conflicts of interest".

Para 1.3 of  WHA58.32 also urges Member States "to ensure that clinicians and other health-care personnel, community health workers and families, parents and other caregivers, particularly of infants at high risk, are provided with enough information and training by health-care providers, in a timely manner on the preparation, use and handling of powdered infant formula in order to minimize health hazards; are informed that powdered infant formula may contain pathogenic microorganisms and must be prepared and used appropriately; and, where applicable, that this information is conveyed through an explicit warning on packaging;

1.6  to work closely with relevant entities, including manufacturers, to continue to reduce the concentration and prevalence of pathogens, including Enterobacter sakazakii, in powdered infant formula;

Nestlé and FTSE4Good: In response to Nutraingredients, Nestlé stated: "We have the industry’s toughest system in place to enforce WHO Code compliance. Indeed, we are the only infant formula manufacturer listed by FTSE4Good, the London Stock Exchange’s Ethical Index." This misrepresents Nestlé being listed by FTSE4Good as there is no requirement that companies comply with the Code to be listed, they have only to present their policy statements and management systems. FTSE has yet to evaluate Nestlé's actual practices on the ground. IBFAN's comparison of company practices given in the State of the Code by Company charts show Nestlé to violate more provisions of the Code and Resolutions than other companies. See:

14.11.FT LausanneBabyMes.pdf182.55 KB
NesBaby PR.pdf188.71 KB



"The first comprehensive nutrition system for babies"


"The first comprehensive automated artificial nutrition system for babies"