Take a look behind the scenes of Baby Milk Action by following the blog of Patti Rundall OBE, Policy Director.
Summaries of stories are given here. Click on the titles for the full posting.
I will be joining IBFAN's team at the World Health Assembly next week. In addition to topics such as Maternal, infant and Young Child nutrition - there will be discussion about WHO's Reform and the Draft over-arching Framework of engagement with non-State actors. See links below and for a letter published in BMJ online. CLICK HERE for WHA Agenda
Period of consultation 29.04.2014 to 15.08.2014
Two important media articles in Nutraingredients about Danone's 'risk of non-compliance' with the Indian IMS Act:
Public consultation on a draft Scientific Opinion on the essential composition of infant and follow-on formulae
24 April 2014
Can nutrition experts be independent if they get $25,000 per annum from Nestle?
CLICK HERE for Update 46 story
Times of India Rema Nagarajan, TNN | Apr 19, 2014, 10.00AM IST
NEW DELHI: The question of conflict of interest among academics who serve on various boards or councils of private corporations is in focus yet again with Nestle admitting that it does offer to pay members of its Creating Shared Value (CSV) Council $25,000 per annum. This has also raised question about the effectiveness of the conflict of interest policy of the medical journal Lancet, given that two of the lead authors of its series on Maternal and Child Nutrition were members of Nestle's Creating Shared Value Advisory Committee.
WHO: No consensus on draft policy on non-State actors
To end hunger, global policy can't be 'business as usual'
UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food
Timothy A. Wise Global Post March 24, 2014
CLICK HERE for IBFAN comment
CLICK HERE for UK Health Forum and World Cancer Research Fund International
CLICK HERE for El Poder del Consumidor
Governments take the ‘drivers’ seat’ on child obesity
A carefully worded EU Action Plan on Childhood Obesity, initiated one year ago under the Irish Presidency, was adopted at the Greek Presidential Conference in Athens on 26th February.1 The Plan reflects the political complexity of the 27-member EU and aims to ‘demonstrate a shared commitment to addressing childhood obesity.’ The priority actions in ‘a possible toolbox of measures for consideration’ respect Member States’ ‘roles and freedom of action in counteracting childhood obesity.’2
On 20th January the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published the preliminary work it will use for its forthcoming evaluation of essential formula ingredients. The review is part of the ongoing overhaul of all EU baby food legislation. 1
DRAFT BFLG IBFAN Comment on Recommendations for Requirements for Food for Special Medical Purposes (FSMP) for infants
CLICK HERE for PDF of this Briefing
CLICK HERE for a PDF of Update 46
Olivier de Schutter, Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food speaking at the UKFG Investing in agriculture for food sovereignty conference
Videos of the speakers from this really inspiring conference are now online at: www.ukfg.org.uk/2013investinginag/
TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED SEE PRESS RELEASE
CLICK HERE for decision on MIYCN
IBFAN is granted status as an NGO working in official relations with WHO
From left to right
Lida Lhotska, IBFAN Regional Coordinator for Europe,
Dr Francesco Branca, Director, WHO Department for Nutrition and Health Development
Dr Elizabeth Mason, Director, WHO Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health
Patti Rundall, Co-Chair, IBFAN’s Global Council.
WHO's EXECUTIVE BOARD (EB) meeting (EB134) in Geneva began on 20th January and ended on the 25th. Conflicts of Interest, WHO's interactions with 'Non State Actors' have been hot topics. The EB decided to refuse ISDI (the baby feeding industry) official status but accepted IBFAN and GAIN. CLICK HERE
January 05, 2014
Jury to decide if baby formula caused Sioux City girl's brain damage Sioux City Journal.com CLICK HERE
16th September 2013
CLICK HERE for a report on DUMEX/Danonein China
For Immediate Release December 19, 2013
Organizations denounce Nestlé’s new human rights impact assessment as a public relations stunt
12 Mandela Quotes That Won't Be In the Corporate Media Obituaries
SUN and Conflicts of Interest:
IBFAN is concerned about the non-transparent process (discussions under Chatham House Rules) chosen by SUN to address conflicts of interest. This process has been led by the Global Social Observatory (GSO), a Geneva-based think tank funded by the GATES Foundation.
Baby Milk Ation comments on the Consultation on goats milk formulas
CLICK HERE for consultation papers
If you agree please use our comments to send a submission to:
DEADLINE for ENGLAND 6th December
IBFAN and many other organisations are becoming increasingly worried about the many trade deals now being struck - more often than not in the shadows - that seem to protect the interests of corporations at the expense of the poor.
Below is a letter that you can sign onto - as a quick way to register your concern.
Three important documents are under discussion now:
1 EU Action Plan to Reduce the Number of stunted children by 7 million by 2025
2 Draft EU Action Plan on Childhood Obesity
3 DRAFT WHO European Region Food and Nutrition Action Plan 2014 – 2020
To understand the complexity of the situation and the pressures on those trying to protect infant health - read this first hand account by VELVET C. ESCARIO-ROXAS
You can see a picture of Velvet campaigning about BPA on the IBFAN website HERE
CLICK here for an INQUIRER NEWS STORY
SUN Business Network Announces New Members
New Soda Tax Makes Mexico a Leading Guardian of Public Health
This month the new government of Mexico made history. In the country that consumes more soda per capita than any in the world, where the former president had been the top executive for Coca-Cola, the national Congress struck a blow for public health by passing a one-peso-per-liter tax on soda and an 8 percent tax on junk food. We in the U.S. can learn a lot from our neighbor to the south--as well as from countries including Finland, Hungary and France that have passed similar measures. Even England's Conservative Party-led government is considering such a tax.
SUPER TYPHOON YOLANDA: BREASTFFEDING SAVES LIVES!
The Nutrition Cluster joint statement on appropriate infant and young child feeding in the current emergency, and caution about unnecessary use of milk products.
Read on for our letter to the Lancet Series on Maternal and Child Nutrition about the fact that two of the authors are members of Nestlé's Creating Shared Value Committee. Such roles could, depending on the circumstance, result in exclusion from European Food Safety Authority Working Groups.
Richard Horton, @richardhorton1 the Editor of the Lancet has since Tweeted the following questions:
Can anyone out there give me evidence about Nestlé's negative influences in health? Opinions are strong, and that's fine, but I need facts.
then later: What about Danone: are they the acceptable face of commercial influence in health? Or not? I just don't know
The power of big food: a few corporate conglomerates shape the way you live your life. How do we resist?
Follow the Twitter correspondence including from Prof Anthony Costello:
"Maybe one way to resist big food is not to have members of Nestle's advisory board directing the Lancet Nutrition Series" - and "Former head UNICEF nutrition asks why Lancet lead authors on nutrition series served on Nestlé Advisory Committe"
Our responses suggesting that he look at hard, on the ground evidence about Nestle or Danone - rather than what they say - have not been acknowledged. The suggestion from Gary Darmstadt of the Gates Foundation to look at FTSE4Good and ATNI (the two industry whitewashes ) was warmly welcomed. Interesting.
Comments by IBFAN, Baby Milk Action and the Baby Feeding Law Group
Tomorrow: 15th November 2013 Member States Experts meeting on Foods for Special Medical Purposes (FSMPs) for infants and pesticides in food for infants and young children
CLICK HERE for background papers
CLICK HERE for Commission FSMP paper
CLICK HERE for Commission Pesticides Paper
CLICK Here for a PDF of IBFAN's comments (text below)
NEW PAPER on NGO concerns about WHO’s consultation on engagement with non-State actors CLICK HERE
PLEASE read and support if you agree.
When: 17–18 October 2013, 10:00–13:00 and 15:00–18:00
Where: Executive Board room, WHO Headquarters
Last night, the Chamber of Deputies, Mexico's lower house of Congress, approved a 1 peso per liter tax on SSBs (10%)
310 in favor, 166 against, 5 abstentions, 19 absent.
Next up, the Senate! (which must vote on the fiscal reform package October 21-31)
CLICK here for background to the Crusade Against Hunger story.
Click here for El Poder del Consumidor - the fantastic consumer group we have been working with to protect child health.
STOP PRESS: December 2013: Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) upheld a complaint against claims in GSK's print advertisement of Junior Horlicks, that ‘added supplement contents like DHA and CHOLINE in the product that are important for child's brain development’, ‘Competent and reliable scientific evidence’ (CRSE)’, ‘supplements containing omega-3 FA like DHA.’
Coming back through Delhi airport this weekend I noticed this promotion for GSK's Junior Horlicks in the Guardian Pharmacy claiming: "100% RDA Nutrients for Growth, DHA for Brain."
I thought all promotion of foods for children under 2 years is stricly banned in India. Since GSK has now joined GAIN perhaps we can expect more of this.
One good piece of news about GSK however - it has sold Ribena and Lucozade.
Here are some Links to background papers that may be useful:
Proposal for a Part B in the Standard for Processed Cereal-Based Foods for Infants and Young Children (Codex Stan 074-1981, Rev – I 2006)
The Secretary General's High Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post 2015 Development Goals, has released its Report with recommendations on the Post MDGs development goals for the next 15 years
With all the dodgy sponsorship of conferences going on people may welcome the IBFAN and Baby Feeding law group guidelines. (Page down for links)
Here I am (9.7.13) with Mike Brady outside the Royal College of Physicians where Nestlé had booked an event targeting health workers under a different name. The RCP say they would not have accepted the booking had they known. See Mike's campaign blog for more details and news, including the cancelling of one in Birmingham tomorrow.
CLICK HERE for PDF of a really good letter about Danone sponsorship from Dra. Cecilia Castillo L. in Chile
CLICK HERE FOR IBFAN STATEMENT ON COCHRANE
CLICK HERE for WHO Euro's new report
Copenhagen, 18 June 2013
CLICK HERE or page down to read the excellent speech made by the Dr Margaret Chan, WHO's Director-General at the 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion Helsinki, Finland 10 June 2013:
"Efforts to prevent noncommunicable diseases go against the business interests of powerful economic operators. In my view, this is one of the biggest challenges facing health promotion. As the new publication makes clear, it is not just Big Tobacco anymore. Public health must also contend with Big Food, Big Soda, and Big Alcohol. All of these industries fear regulation, and protect themselves by using the same tactics. Research has documented these tactics well. They include front groups, lobbies, promises of self-regulation, lawsuits, and industry-funded research that confuses the evidence and keeps the public in doubt. In the view of WHO, the formulation of health policies must be protected from distortion by commercial or vested interests."
European Parliament to vote New regulations on baby food marketing
See previous blog entry HERE
The EU Parliament's ENVI Committee yesterday voted unanimously for the new proposals for a Regulation on food intended for infants and young children, food for special medical purposes. This will now go forward for the final vote in the full EU Parliament in Strasbourg in June.
One of the things we have been lobbying for in these proposals is the issue of 'optional ingredients' and the pre-authorisation of all ingredients used in baby formulas and foods, so we are pleased that once this regulation is adopted these issues can be considered in the new delegated acts. Whatever happens, there will be more oversight from Parliament on all new ingredients.
Marketing junkfood to children : two familiar figures visit the World Health Assembly - Ronald McDonald and Tony the Tiger look for new jobs handing out their CVs to delegates attending the World Health Assembly. 20th May
Here I am being refused entry into the UN, apparently because I failed to meet the UN dress code. Later in the week I was given a much better reason for the refusal - that it was deceptive. Perhaps the corporations that use these disguises to befriend children could think about that!
CLICK HERE for PDF of Consumers International Press release
CLICK HERE for World Public Health Nutrition Weblink.
CLICK HERE: Kelloggs has to payout. 28th May: www.cerealsettlement.com
Here I am outside the headquarters of the World Health Organization taking a breather.
Friday 29 March 2013 was the last day for public comments on the 4th draft of WHO's Global Action Plan for the prevention and Control of NCDs (2013-2020)
Today is the last day for comments on the Public web consultation on WHO’s engagement with non-State actors.
Some other items that may be of interest:
United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights States, business, civil society and other stakeholders can submit suggestions for the 2013 United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights.
Submissions may be sent to email@example.com by 12 April 2013.
Below is an excerpt from an excellent article in Today's Guardian about baby food companies in Indonesia:
If you agree that breastfeeding should be specifically mentioned in the next Millennium Development Goals please make a submission - however short - to an online consultation that ends 10th January. Follow this link Contributions can be posted on the consultation website(www.fao.org/fsnforum/post-2015) or sent to firstname.lastname@example.org and are welcome in English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Russian and Chinese.
IBFAN's submission is HERE
STOP PRESS: We understand that this research is to stop. Thanks to all those who supported this campaign
Please help stop the industry funded research about to start in Indonesia entitled "Effect in Using Formula Composed with Cow's Milk Fat, Enriched with Mixed Fats & Added Fosfolipid on Duration & Infection in Babies' Digestive and Respiratory System"
IBFAN has written to the Her Excellency, Dilma Roussef, DD President of Brazil, about the Regulation of Law 11265/2006 which protects infants from the unethical commercial promotion of products that undermine breastfeeding practices.
The link to one of the letters is HERE
The interesting article in the Guardian about the tour of the Nestle ship is HERE
Join the ongoing discussion in the BMJ about Veena Rao's personal opinion piece entitled, "Law on infant foods inhibits the marketing of complementary foods for infants, furthering undernutrition in India" click HERE Following our complaint the BMJ has published the following correction: "In this online Personal View (10.1136/bmj.e8131) the author, Veena Rao, did not declare any competing interests. She has now told us that she has been “a member of the Advisory Board on the Britannia Nutrition Foundation (a non-profit trust) since 2009.” The website of the foundation is at www.britannia.co.in/bnf/index.html. 2012;345:e8131, doi:Ms Rao has submitted a further comment but fails to mention that Britannia Nutrition Foundation is funded by Brittania Industries Ltd.
IBFAN's Discussion Paper on the Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative - outlining our concerns about the role of businesses and why we cannot be part of SUN has been posted onto the SUN wesbite here just above a link to the launch of the SUN Business network
Cross Branding - how this can harm infant and young child health
A BMJ study looked at the impact of idealised images and cross branding (in this case Nestlé's Mother and Baby bear logo on coffee creamer ) in LAOS one of the world's poorest countries. It s relevant and pertinent to the ongoing discussions in Codex.
I have been attending an EU Food Law meeting this week on The Revision of the PARNUTs Directive - it was attended by all the major companies.
The Infant Feeding Survey (IFS) has been conducted every five years since 1975. The 2010 IFS was the eighth national survey of infant feeding practices to be conducted. The main aim of the survey was to provide estimates on the incidence, prevalence, and duration of breastfeeding and other feeding practices adopted by mothers in the first eight to ten months after their baby was born.
IBFAN recommendations for strengthening the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on food intended for infants and young children and on food for special medical purposes
Nice story sent by Siti Norjinah Moin, Founder of the Malaysian Breastfeeding Association. Director of Breastfeeding Information Bureau (BIB Malaysia).
I gave four presentations at this marvellous nutrition conference - which was the first of its kind to be free of corporate funding - and it showed.
Andy Chetley dies Wednesday 17th October 2012
‘Preventing disease and saving resources: the potential contribution of increasing breastfeeding rates in the UK’
Food, beverage industry pays for seat at health-policy table
Click here for the Reuters report on WHO that has generated a flurry of responses - page down
Fringe meetings at the Labour Party Conference in Manchester 1st - 3rd October
Responses to WHO consultation: Updated Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases - 2013-2020
IBFAN's response is here:
The World Cancer Research Fund response is here:
WHY IBFAN HAS NOT SIGNED ON CIVIL SOCIETY PLEDGE OF ‘A RENEWED PROMISE’ INITIATIVE
Sunday 12th August 2012 - World Leader Summit on hunger - hosted by David Cameron
'Challenges for Mother and Child Health: perspectives from Southern Africa' ,
All are welcome to the Prof Zef Ebrahim Memorial Lecture on Wednesday 3rd October 2012 at 12 noon in the Kennedy Lecture Theatre, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London. The talk will be given in Zef's honour by one of his ex-students, Dr Felicitas Zawairi, now WHO Representative in Malawi.
Zef work has been of critical importance to IBFAN and Baby Milk Action since the 70s and we miss him terribly. (More to follow)
For Zef's Obituary in the Guardian see:
The 65th World Health Assembly passed an important Resolution on Maternal, infant and young child nutrition.
For Press release see: http://info.babymilkaction.org/IYCNResolution2012
The proposed text is attached as a pdf. This was adopted today.
For further details contact Patti Rundall, Baby Milk Action Policy Director on: 07786 523493
This front cover of TIME magazine has generated huge debate....
A national campaign against obesity spreads to South Florida in an effort to stop hospitals from giving free formula to new moms.....
see our press release on this worrying news.
Here are some links to a brand new video “All about IBFAN” on youtube
NEW PDF: ENGLISH TEXT
Did you know that it is against the rules for television programmes to accept payment for showing baby milk in television programmes?
The Business of malnutrition: breaking down trade rules to profit from the poor
Click here for the press release following this meeting:
Day 1 - Saturday 12 November
I am attending the Codex meeting in Bad Soden, Frankfurt this week, wearing the IACFO hat, along with IBFAN colleagues from Swaziland, Canada and Luxembourg. See below for our comments on the agenda items.
At the last meeting of the European Platform for Diet and Physical Activity, on the 6th October in Brussels, Mars, Media Smart and others gave presentations about their nutrition and media education projects.
Urgent call for pre-authorisation of baby food ingredients
IBFAN Comments on UN Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases
Voluntary controls fail to reduce harmful advertising
Call for endorsement of IBFAN’s comments on Children's Rights and Business Principles Initiative (CRBPI)
Statement delivered by Lida Lhotska, IBFAN European Coordinator
SEE ATTACHED BRIEFING
See this awful paper from the Scottish Government, Principles for food companies working with schools in Scotland which seems to contain absolutely no principles:
Dr Nicholas Alipui, Director of Programme at UNICEF HQ in New york has responded to a request from an MEP for an opinion on the DHA claim.
"a butterfly flapping it's wings in one area of the world, can cause a tornado in another part of the world"
Here is a really important development
Please see all the links to the relevant papers here:
The whole Resolution is attached. The key paragraphs (J-S and 1-3) are on pages 4 and 5:
Patti Rundall, Baby Milk Action Policy Director, on the BBC Politics Show East Midlands on 13 February 2010.
Send a message to Members of the European Parliament by going to:
"The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you've got it made" Jean Giraudoux (1882-1944).
News from the
European Parliamentary Labour Party
27 January 2011
For Immediate Release
EURO-MPS BATTLE TO BLOCK BABY MILK HEALTH CLAIM
Please go to: http://info.babymilkaction.org/news/campaignblog260111
Consumers International/IBFAN speeches at the WHO Executive Board Meeting, Geneva. January 2011, WHO Geneva
The debate about the value of the BMJ comment piece rages on, with misleading stories and headlines falsely implying that breastfeeding is a risk to health and that the UK guidance is a rigid dictate to mothers forbidding any food other than breastmilk until the clock strikes midnight at the end of the 6th month. Since some of the media are also questioning whether the links between the authors and the baby food industry are relevant, I thought it might be helpful to explain our concerns about the paper, its timing and the authors' knowledge of the risks of media reporting.
Consultation on Bisphenol A: The Plastic Materials and Articles in Contact with Food (Eng)
see also new Policy Blog: http://info.babymilkaction.org/node/326
WHO breastfeeding recommendations under attack from industry-funded scientists
Press release 14 January 2011
The BBC, the Guardian, The Times, The Sun and other media are carrying stories - about a comment piece from four authors published in the British Medical Journal today challenging World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendation that breastfeeding is exclusive for 6 months (no other foods or drinks introduced). The media coverage implies that the challenge is based on new evidence. In fact this is not a new scientific study nor a systematic review, but the authors review of selected past research, published in the 'Analysis' section of the BMJ.
New Zealand ASA upholds complaint against Wyeth for S26 Lutien eye claim
Two magazine advertisements published in Littles were both very similar and featured the headline piece which read:
“SEE THE WORLD THROUGH THEIR EYES”
STOP PRESS: The EU Committee that met on the 6th December APPROVED the claim that DHA improves eyesight for use on follow-on milks and baby foods, Members of the European Parliament and the European Council now have 3 months to comment.
Please contact your local MEP and asked them to stop this claim being approved.
EU deadline for DHA, ALA and ARA claims
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) continues to plough through the hundreds of dossiers supplied by food companies who wish to make claims on foods (see UDs 41 & 42). We focus on children’s food and formula claims which fall under Article 14 of the European Nutrition and Health Claims Regulations (1924/2006).
Baby Milk Action response to Department of Health Questions regarding commercial involvement in Start 4 Life October 2010
What would your criteria be for supporting the inclusion of an organisation as a Start4Life partner?
In addition to the submission made on behalf of the Baby Feeding Law Group and the Breastfeeding Manifesto Coalition Baby Milk Action would like to make some additional comments regarding the consultation about Private Sector involvement with Start for Life.
The questions posed need to be rephrased. Baby Milk Action is not comfortable with being seen as supporting partnership with any for-profit company on any government health education scheme, especially on Start4Life. Our position has, from the start, been that the involvement of commercial companies in education schemes risks undue commercial influence of the messages being conveyed, increasing the likelihood that parents receive conflicting messages which are known to undermine the DH public health line. We cannot stress enough the importance of all governments taking seriously their responsibilities and obligations under the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Nutrition to provide truly objective, evidence-based information and support to parents.
Arch Dis Child published online July 26, 2010 J S Forsyth
International code of marketing of breast-milkand international governance --three decades later time for hostilities to be replaced by effective national substitutes
An article in the Archive of Diseases in Childhood by Prof Stewart Forsyth (who declares long-standing collaboration with the formula companies) portrays a harmful message about Baby Milk Action and other groups monitoring and campaigning to stop the harmful marketing of baby foods. Below are some comments about the article and the media coverage it is generating:
Baby Milk Action response to the Department of Children Schools and Families consultation: Assessing the Impact of the Commercial World on Children's Wellbeing - A Call for Evidence July 2008
The Baby Feeding Law Group representing 24 leading health professional and lay organisations in the UK, including the Royal Colleges of Paediatrics, Nursing and Midwifery, has written to the US company Mead Johnson about its irresponsible promotion of Alactagrow in the Philippines.
One aspect of the new Education Minister, Michael Gove's policy that hasn't been questioned is what he means when he will check whether parents who want to set up new schools have a "dark agenda."
Good that he promises not to allow extremist religious groups,' fake theories' and 'bogus science' - but what about the corporate agenda?
What happened when Nestlé was reported for violating the UN Global Compact and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises?
The UN Global Compact and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises seek to improve compliance of businesses with human rights norms and other international standards. A coalition of organisations registered complaints in June 2009 regarding Nestlé S.A. to the Global Compact Office and the Swiss National Contact Point (NCP) for the OECD Guidelines. Both stressed they are responsible for voluntary initiatives and that they are only prepared to promote 'dialogue'. Although the UN Global Compact Office has powers to exclude companies, it stated: "Of course, abuses of the 10 Principles do occur; however we believe that such abuses only indicate that it is important for the company to remain in the Compact and learn from its mistakes." It is suggested that this international regulatory framework is both ineffective at holding corporations to account and is misused for public relations purposes. Alternatives are proposed.
Question tabled in the House of Lords by Lord Avebury, (Lib Dem Peer) 30th November 2009
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will discuss with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees the desirability of entering into a new partnership agreement with Nestlé, with reference to the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and subsequent relevant World Health Assembly resolutions. [HL378]
The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead): We fully support the principles of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and subsequent resolutions adopted by the World Health Assembly and are committed to the promotion and encouragement of breastfeeding for infants. We have spoken with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and understand that they are in the process of considering their position.
6 Jan 2010 : Column WA99
US bans DHA and ARA in organic formulas
Obama administration bans two additives used in organic baby food
By Kimberly Kindy Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, April 28, 2010
The Obama administration announced Tuesday that two synthetic additives will no longer be permitted in infant formula or baby foods certified as organic because the widely used ingredients have not received legal approval for use in organic products The additives -- omega-3 fatty acid DHA and omega-6 fatty acid ARA -- are present in 90 percent of organic infant formulas and are marketed as promoting brain and eye development in ways that mimic breast milk. The Washington Post reported last July that U.S. Department of Agriculture employees had concluded three years earlier that the fatty acids violated federal standards and should be banned from products carrying the federal organic label. Their findings were overruled by a USDA program manager who had been heavily lobbied by the formula industry.
Below is my intervention at Nestlé's Shareholder meeting in April 2010 in Lausanne. I challenged the company about its failure to abide by marketing standards adopted by the World Health Assembly and about it health claims strategy which tells mothers in 120 countries that its baby milk will 'protect' their babies. At this AGM we were joined by Greenpeace activists who cut through the ceiling to challenge Nestle about its exploitation of palm oil.
In response to Greenpeace, Peter Brabeck, Nestlé's Chair and CEO said: 'Tying corporations up in regulatory straightjackets is unnecessary when companies such as Nestlé already have sound principles and core values.’
Breastfeeding provides an ideal window of opportunity for obesity prevention and may help in the development of taste receptors and appetite control.
The US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) considered that there are two potential, cost-effective interventions that can be put into place immediately to deal with the childhood obesity epidemic: decreased television viewing and breastfeeding promotion.
“Artificially fed infants consume 30,000 more calories than breastfed infants by 8 months of age” (equivalent to 120 chocolate bars - 4 a week). Student Study Guide for Breastfeeding and Human Lactation KG Auerbach, J Riordan - 1993
As pressure builds to stop junk food advertising to children, many companies are focussing attention on nutrition and health education in an attempt to re-establish themselves as producers of healthy food. By building public trust in this image they can divert attention from the continued aggressive marketing of unhealthy foods. The education materials and facilities that are produced as a result present an even more complex problem than straightforward advertising because they blur the boundaries between advertising, marketing and education.
Although individual employees often have philanthropic motives, corporations themselves have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to maximise profits, so the deal will be done with multiple motives:
For example, companies will hope to:
Government panel says there need to be 'steps taken' to address problems in enforcing baby milk marketing law. Campaigners welcome recommendation and call for UK law to be brought into line with international standards http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/pressrelease11mar10a
The report of the Independent Review Panel has been published today (11th March) on the DH and FSA wesbites. The Minister for Public Health, Gillian Merron, will publish her response 'as soon as possible'.
Baby Milk Action and the Baby Feeding Law Group will publish a response ASAP also.
A summary of the responses can be found on this link:
On behalf of the Baby Feeding Law Group I ask the FSA Board about:
Tim Smith, CEO of the FSA responds.
to see the video follow this link and choose Q&A
Overview of evidence on health inequalities and their social determinants
Baby Milk Action is offering an online course on monitoring the baby food industry.
The first two modules are now available to members of Baby Milk Action.
If you are registered as a member with the site and logged in, you will see links under the courses menu saying Module 1 and Module 2.
<---------- Look at the menu on the left for where it says "Courses".
Click on the link to the relevant module to begin or continue with the course. If you cannot see links saying "Module 1" and "Module 2", click here to confirm you are logged in.
If you are a member and have not yet registered with the site, click here to register.
If you belong to an organisation (such as IFIT) that has arranged for you to do the course, register in the same way as a Baby Milk Action member, but specify the name of your organisation when you contact us to upgrade your registration.
The course will consist of 8 modules based on the training the International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) gives to member organisations around the world. These have been tailored to the situation in the UK and include information on the narrower UK marketing legislation.
Each module consists of short filmed talks, quizzes, reading, a powerpoint presentation and an exercise. Participants have access to the tutor via the online discussion forum and will be able to book a personal tutorial by phone or skype during the course. The course culminates in a guided monitoring exercise to receive a Baby Milk Action certificate as a Code Monitor.
There will be a small charge for each module (£15.00 each). Members of Baby Milk Action can do the first two modules free of charge and the remaining modules at a discounted price (£10.00 each). If you have registered with the site as a member, we will contact you as each module becomes available over the coming months. The course will be made available for non-members once all modules are available.
If you are a member of Baby Milk Action or an organisation that has arranged for you to do the course, then you can set up your registration with this site now to access the first module. Click here for details.
Membership of Baby Milk Action starts at just £7.00. To find out more, click here.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMME GUIDANCE
Preventing obesity: whole system approaches
Consultation on the Draft Scope February 2010
Watch this space for blogs from Patti Rundall OBE, Baby Milk Action Policy Director.
Patti will explain the challenges, actions and successes in the world of shaping the policies relating to infant feeding. At national, European Union and international level.
Breastfeeding is best for babies. All parents should know this. Breastfed babies have less risk of short and long-term illness. There are also health benefits for mothers who breastfeed.But if you have decided to use formula, for whatever reason, how do you decide which formula to use? Where do you find the information you need?
In this 4-part film, lasting less than 30 minutes, you can listen to Baby Milk Action's Campaigns and Networking Coordinator, Mike Brady, provide answers to these and other questions.
Part 1 is given above (if you cannot see the player, check you have Adobe Flashplayer installed). This covers: Department of Health on formula; composition of formula; claims that are companies can make about formula.
You will have to register to watch the following parts of the film (there is no charge to do so).
Part 2: The development of formula; putting risk in perspective; changes to formula composition; LCPs.
Part 3: Oligosaccharides ('Prebiotics'); how to choose between formulas; follow-on formula and Goodnight milks.
Part 4: Guidance on mixing up powdered formula to reduce risks.
If you have already registered and are logged in, click here for part 2.
2010 Update The safety of the ingredients - the US experience:
IBFAN press release
FAO/WHO Codex Nutrition Committee (CCFSNDU)
Chiang Mai, Thailand, 3rd November 2006
Cereal-based baby foods are an unlikely subject of controversy but this week they have been at the centre of a bitter struggle between health advocates and the multibillion dollar baby food industry whose interests were defended by the European Commission and the United States. The controversy centered on sugar levels and the rising levels of obesity and food related diseases which are fast consuming health budgets across the globe.
Download the attached pdf for the full press release.