Policy blog

Take a look behind the scenes of Baby Milk Action by following the blog of Patti Rundall OBE, Policy Director.
Summaries of stories are given here. Click on the titles for the full posting.

Conflict of Interest statement has 149 endorsers - and counting

For a pdf with the updated list of endorsers - click here.

IBFAN comments on the review of Baby food legislation (PARNUTs)

 

See the Press release about the European Parliament's Environment,  Public Health and Food Safety  Committee (ENVI) debate on 20th December.

IBFAN Comments 

PDF of  commentary on the Commission's proposals 

WHO Executive Board Meeting

At the WHO Executive Board meeting 16-23rd January, I joined the IBFAN and Consumers International delegation, focussing WHOs Maternal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition Plan, the proposals for the Reform of WHO, and the strategy for controlling Non-Communicable Diseases. 

Product placement of baby milk in TV programmes is banned

Did you know that it is against the rules for television programmes to accept payment for showing baby milk in television programmes? 

The ban is contained in the Ofcom Broadcasting Code.

Ofcom (the independent regulator and competition authority for the UK communication industries) introduced rules regarding product placement in television programmes in February 2011. 

Products that cannot be placed in programmes include: "infant formula (baby milk), including follow-on formula". However, Ofcom does point out that some products may appear in programmes because they have been chosen by the producers as props. Companies can be fined for breaking the rules. 

You can find the text of rules via the Law section of the Baby Feeding Law Group (BFLG) website and information on how to register a complaint in the Report violations section of the same site. Baby Milk Action coordinates the BFLG monitoring project.

Baby Milk Action submitted comments to the Ofcom and government consultations on the proposals, calling for all baby foods to be included in the ban. Our full submission can be downloaded by clicking here.

Was this useful? Please click here.

 

Follow-on milks and baby food claims to be debated at Codex meeting in Germany

The Business of malnutrition: breaking down trade rules to profit from the poor

Click here for the press release following this meeting:

http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/pressrelease24nov110

 

 

Day 1  - Saturday 12 November  

I am attending the Codex meeting in Bad Soden, Frankfurt this week, wearing the IACFO hat, along with IBFAN colleagues from Swaziland, Canada and Luxembourg.   See below for our comments on the agenda items.

WHO Reform highlights the importance of protecting WHO's independence and integrity.

WHO held a special Executive Board Meeting in Geneva 1-3rd October on proposals for WHO Reforms for a Health future.  A summary  report on the WHO website states that "The Board felt strongly that in any opportunity for engagement, WHO’s independence and integrity must be protected from undue influence by those with vested interests"   http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2011/eb_20111104/en/index.html

Exposing the risks of food industry involvement in education

At the last meeting of the European Platform for Diet and Physical Activity, on the 6th October in Brussels, Mars, Media Smart and others gave presentations about their nutrition and media  education  projects.

Urgent call - help improve the safety of ingredients. Call for pre-authorisation

Urgent call for pre-authorisation of baby food ingredients

Comments on UN Political Declaration on Non-Communicable Diseases

IBFAN Comments on UN Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases

 

Throwing oneself “into the lions’ den”

Article in La Liberté  and Le Courier about out the Nestle Shareholder meetings  - 29.7.11  - in French

Here is an English translation of the text:

Articles about Partnerships and Voluntary controls

Voluntary controls fail to reduce harmful advertising

Call for endorsement of IBFAN’s comments on Children's Rights and Business Principles Initiative (CRBPI)

Call for endorsement of IBFAN’s comments on Children's Rights and Business Principles Initiative (CRBPI)

 

Please send an email by 14th July to: prundall@babymilkaction.org if your organisation can endorse these comments which will be submitted before the consultation deadline: 15th July.

WHA 64 Consumers International/ IBFAN Statement on draft HIV Strategy

PDF version

Statement delivered by Lida Lhotska, IBFAN European Coordinator

Tackling Obesity: How Companies Use Education to Build Trust.

SEE ATTACHED BRIEFING

 

 

See this awful paper from the Scottish Government, Principles for food companies working with schools in Scotland  which seems to contain absolutely no principles: 

 

Kinder Chocolate promotion in the EU parliament

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNICEF expresses its support for the Resolution opposing the health claim

Dr Nicholas Alipui,  Director of Programme at UNICEF HQ in New york has responded to a request from an MEP for an opinion on the DHA claim. 

Letter to MEPs from Sri Lanka about the DHA claim

"a butterfly flapping it's wings in one area of the world, can cause a tornado in another part of the world"

US FDA survey of 10,000 women's understanding of health claims

Here is a really important development

European Parliament Resolution refusing the authorisation of DHA health claim and industry comment

Please see all the links to the relevant papers here:

http://info.babymilkaction.org/news/policyblog/dhabriefing

The whole  Resolution is  attached. The key paragraphs (J-S and 1-3) are on pages 4 and 5:

BBC Politics Show on DHA Claim

 

Patti Rundall, Baby Milk Action Policy Director, on the BBC Politics Show East Midlands on 13 February 2010.

Send a message to Members of the European Parliament by going to:

http://info.babymilkaction.org/cem/cemfeb11

 

 

Indian Alliance Against Conflict of Interest writes to Minister about Nestlé.

Cerelac in India Feb 2011Cerelac in India Feb 2011"The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you've got it made"    Jean Giraudoux (1882-1944).

 

DHA briefing - redirect

Please click here.

EURO-MPS BATTLE TO BLOCK BABY MILK HEALTH CLAIM

News from the 

European Parliamentary Labour Party

Press Release

27 January 2011

For Immediate Release

EURO-MPS BATTLE TO BLOCK BABY MILK HEALTH CLAIM

Redirect

Consumers International/ IBFAN speeches, WHO Executive Board Meeting

30 years of IBFAN

Consumers International/IBFAN speeches at the WHO Executive Board Meeting, Geneva.  January 2011, WHO Geneva

How media reporting can derail health policy

 

The debate about the value of the BMJ comment piece rages on, with misleading stories and headlines falsely implying that breastfeeding is a risk to health and that the UK guidance is a rigid dictate to mothers forbidding any food other than breastmilk until the clock strikes midnight at the end of the 6th month.  Since some of the media are also questioning whether the links between the authors and the baby food industry are relevant,  I thought it might be helpful to explain our concerns about the paper, its  timing and the authors' knowledge of the risks of media reporting.

BFLG response to Consultation on Bisphenol A in feeding bottles

Consultation on Bisphenol A: The Plastic Materials and Articles in Contact with Food (Eng)

WHO breastfeeding recommendations under attack from industry-funded scientists.

see also new Policy Blog: http://info.babymilkaction.org/node/326


WHO breastfeeding recommendations under attack from industry-funded scientists

Press release 14 January 2011

The BBC,  the Guardian, The Times, The Sun and  other media are carrying stories - about a comment piece from four authors published in the British Medical Journal today challenging World Health Organisation (WHO) recommendation that breastfeeding is exclusive for 6 months (no other foods or drinks introduced). The media coverage implies that the challenge is based on new evidence. In fact this is not a new scientific study nor a systematic review, but the authors review of selected past research, published in the 'Analysis' section of the BMJ. 

New Zealand ASA upholds complaint against Wyeth for S26 Lutien eye claim

New Zealand ASA upholds complaint against Wyeth for S26 Lutien eye claim  

 Two magazine advertisements published in Littles were both very similar and featured the headline piece which read:

“SEE  THE WORLD  THROUGH THEIR EYES” 


EU to decide on DHA claims

STOP PRESS: The EU Committee that met on the 6th December APPROVED the claim that DHA improves eyesight for use on follow-on milks and baby foods,   Members of the European Parliament and the European Council now have 3 months to comment. 

Please contact your local MEP and asked them to stop this claim being approved.


EU deadline for DHA, ALA and ARA claims

 

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) continues to plough through the hundreds of dossiers supplied by food companies who wish to make claims on foods (see UDs 41 & 42). We focus on children’s food and formula claims which fall under Article 14 of the European Nutrition and Health Claims Regulations (1924/2006).  

Commercial involvement in UK Start4Life: Baby Milk Action Comments

Baby Milk Action response to Department of Health Questions regarding commercial involvement in Start 4 Life  October 2010

 What would your criteria be for supporting the inclusion of an organisation as a Start4Life partner?

 In addition to the submission made on behalf of the Baby Feeding Law Group and the Breastfeeding Manifesto Coalition Baby Milk Action would like to make some additional comments regarding the consultation about Private Sector involvement with Start for Life.

The questions posed need to be rephrased. Baby Milk Action is not comfortable with being seen as supporting partnership with any for-profit company on any government health education scheme, especially on Start4Life. Our position has, from the start, been that the involvement of commercial companies in education schemes risks undue commercial influence of the messages being conveyed, increasing the likelihood that parents receive conflicting messages which are known to undermine the DH public health line.  We cannot stress enough the importance of  all governments taking seriously their responsibilities and obligations under the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Nutrition to provide truly objective, evidence-based information and support to parents.

Article in Archives of Diseases in Childhood

 Arch Dis Child published online July 26, 2010 J S Forsyth

http://adc.bmj.com/content/early/2010/06/22/adc.2010.187294.full

International code of marketing of breast-milkand international governance --three decades later time for hostilities to be replaced by effective national substitutes 

An article  in  the Archive of Diseases in Childhood by Prof Stewart Forsyth (who declares long-standing collaboration with the formula companies) portrays a harmful message about Baby Milk Action and other groups monitoring and campaigning to stop the harmful marketing of baby foods. Below are some comments about the article and the media coverage it is generating: 

Response to DCSF Consultation on Impact of the Commercial World on Children's Wellbeing - A Call for Evidence

 

Baby Milk Action  response to the Department of Children Schools and Families consultation: Assessing the Impact of the Commercial World on Children's Wellbeing - A Call for Evidence    July  2008

Baby Feeding Law Group writes to Mead Johnson about Alactagrow promotion in the Philippines

AlactaGifttoChild.jpg

The Baby Feeding Law Group  representing 24 leading health professional and lay organisations in the UK,  including the Royal Colleges of Paediatrics, Nursing and Midwifery, has written to the US company Mead Johnson about its irresponsible promotion of Alactagrow in the Philippines. 

Michael Gove's 'Dark Agenda'

 One aspect of the new Education Minister, Michael Gove's policy that hasn't been questioned is what he means when he will check whether parents who want to set up new schools have a "dark agenda."

Good that he promises not to allow extremist religious groups,' fake theories' and 'bogus science' - but what about the corporate agenda?

Nestle, the UN Global Compact and OECD Guidelines

What happened when Nestlé was reported for violating the UN Global Compact and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises?

 

Abstract 

The UN Global Compact and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises seek to improve compliance of businesses with human rights norms and other international standards. A coalition of organisations registered complaints in June 2009 regarding Nestlé S.A. to the Global Compact Office and the Swiss National Contact Point (NCP) for the OECD Guidelines. Both stressed they are responsible for voluntary initiatives and that they are only prepared to promote 'dialogue'. Although the UN Global Compact Office has powers to exclude companies, it stated: "Of course, abuses of the 10 Principles do occur; however we believe that such abuses only indicate that it is important for the company to remain in the Compact and learn from its mistakes." It is suggested that this international regulatory framework is both ineffective at holding corporations to account and is misused for public relations purposes. Alternatives are proposed.

Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead answers Lord Avebury's PQ on Nestle and UNHCR

Question tabled in the House of Lords by Lord Avebury, (Lib Dem Peer) 30th November 2009

 

    To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will discuss with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees the desirability of entering into a new partnership agreement with Nestlé, with reference to the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and subsequent relevant World Health Assembly resolutions. [HL378]

    The Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead): We fully support the principles of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and subsequent resolutions adopted by the World Health Assembly and are committed to the promotion and encouragement of breastfeeding for infants. We have spoken with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and understand that they are in the process of considering their position.

    6 Jan 2010 : Column WA99

US bans synthetic DHA ARA in organic formulas

US bans DHA and ARA in organic formulas

Obama administration bans two additives used in organic baby food

By Kimberly Kindy  Washington Post Staff Writer   Wednesday, April 28, 2010

The Obama administration announced Tuesday that two synthetic additives will no longer be permitted in infant formula or baby foods certified as organic because the widely used ingredients have not received legal approval for use in organic products  The additives -- omega-3 fatty acid DHA and omega-6 fatty acid ARA -- are present in 90 percent of organic infant formulas and are marketed as promoting brain and eye development in ways that mimic breast milk. The Washington Post reported last July that U.S. Department of Agriculture employees had concluded three years earlier that the fatty acids violated federal standards and should be banned from products carrying the federal organic label. Their findings were overruled by a USDA program manager who had been heavily lobbied by the formula industry.

Nestle challenged at its AGM 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland 15th April

Nestle challenged over its health claims strategy which  tells mothers in 120 countries that its baby milk will 'protect' their babies.

As Greenpeace activists cut through the ceiling of the Palais in Lausanne the Nestle AGM Nestlé, one of the world's most boycotted companies because of the way it markets baby milk, was challenged at its shareholder meeting about its failure to abide by marketing standards adopted by the World Health Assembly. 

"Good afternoon. Thank you very much for allowing me to  speak once more..... 

 

BREAKTHROUGH IN THE PHILIPPINES: BREASTFEEDING IN THE WORKPLACE IS A LAW

Tackling Obesity: How Companies Use Education to Build Trust. Briefing

 

 

 

 

Breastfeeding provides an ideal window of opportunity for obesity prevention and may help in the development of taste receptors and appetite control.

 The US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) considered that there are two potential, cost-effective interventions that can be put into place immediately to deal with the childhood obesity epidemic: decreased television viewing and breastfeeding promotion.

“Artificially fed infants consume 30,000 more calories than breastfed infants by 8 months of age” (equivalent to 120 chocolate bars - 4 a week). Student Study Guide for Breastfeeding and Human Lactation KG Auerbach, J Riordan - 1993 

As pressure builds to stop junk food advertising to children, many companies are focussing attention on nutrition and health education in an attempt to re-establish themselves as producers of healthy food. By  building public trust in this image they can divert attention from the continued aggressive marketing of unhealthy foods.  The  education materials and facilities that are produced as a result present an even more complex problem than straightforward advertising because they blur the boundaries between advertising, marketing and education.

Although  individual employees often have philanthropic motives, corporations themselves have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to maximise profits, so the deal will be done with multiple motives: 

For example, companies will hope to:

 

 

 

 

  • involve potential critics in partnerships and so discourage  them from speaking out;
  • discourage open debate about sponsors
  • undermine the independence of monitoring schemes;
  • use education facilities as a channel for commercial propaganda which undermines public health messages;
  • project a healthy, responsible corporate image and so gain the trust of children, parents and teachers;
  • distort the curriculum in favour of business interests - promoting a self regulation and partnership approach to marketing rather than regulation;
  • use the ‘halo’ effect as evidence of Corporate Social Responsibility 
  • divert attention from/‘engineer consent’ for actions which are anti-social and which harm sustainable development, the environment and human survival. 

For examples and more download the PDF .........

 

 

 

Independent Review Panel reports Press release 11 March 2010

Government panel says there need to be 'steps taken' to address problems in enforcing baby milk marketing law. Campaigners welcome recommendation and call for UK law to be brought into line with international standards http://info.babymilkaction.org/pressrelease/pressrelease11mar10a

Publication of the Review of infant formula and follow-on formula controls

The report of the Independent Review Panel has been published today (11th March) on the DH and FSA wesbites. The Minister for Public Health, Gillian Merron,  will publish her response 'as soon as possible'.

Baby Milk Action and the Baby Feeding Law Group  will publish a response ASAP also.

http://www.food.gov.uk/healthiereating/nutcomms/infformreview/

http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/Publicati...

A summary of the responses can be found on this link:

http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/ifr39.pdf

Questions put to the Food Standards Agency (FSA) Board November 2009

On behalf of the Baby Feeding Law Group I ask the FSA Board  about:

  • the narrow remit of the  Independent Review Panel and suggest that it has been a waste of public money;
  • the conflicts of interest in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the impact this may have on the report of the working group on complementary feeding 
  • concerns about the EFSA decisions on health claims on formulas and baby foods.  
  • taxes on junk food.

 

Tim Smith, CEO of the FSA responds.

to see the video follow this link and choose Q&A 

http://www.flyonthewall.com/FlyBroadcast/FSA/LondonBoard1109/

 

Marmot Review health inequalities and their social determinants Baby Milk Action response July 2009

 

Overview of evidence on health inequalities and their social determinants 

 

 

Monitoring the baby food industry

Baby Milk Action is offering an online course on monitoring the baby food industry. 

The first module is now available to members of Baby Milk Action. If you are registered as a member with the site and logged in, you will see a link under the courses menu saying Module 1. Click on the link to begin the course.

If you belong to an organisation (such as IFIT) that has arranged for you to do the course, register in the same way as a Baby Milk Action member, but specify the name of your organisation when you contact us to upgrade your registration.

The course will consist of 8 modules based on the training the International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) gives to member organisations around the world. These have been tailored to the situation in the UK and include information on the narrower UK marketing legislation.

Each module consists of short filmed talks, quizzes, reading, a powerpoint presentation and an exercise. Participants have access to the tutor via the online discussion forum and will be able to book a personal tutorial by phone or skype during the course. The course culminates in a guided monitoring exercise to receive a Baby Milk Action certificate as a Code Monitor.

There will be a small charge for each module. Members of Baby Milk Action can do the first two modules free of charge. If you have registered with the site as a member, we will contact you as each module becomes available over the coming months. The course will be made available for non-members in the future.

If you are a member of Baby Milk Action or an organisation that has arranged for you to do the course, then you can set up your registration with this site now to access the first module. Click here for details.

Membership of Baby Milk Action starts at just £7.00. To find out more, click here.

 

Baby Milk Action submission to NICE consultation on Preventing Obesity

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAMME GUIDANCE

Preventing obesity: whole system approaches

Consultation on the Draft Scope February 2010

Patti Rundall's Policy blog coming soon

Watch this space for blogs from Patti Rundall OBE, Baby Milk Action Policy Director.

Patti will explain the challenges, actions and successes in the world of shaping the policies relating to infant feeding. At national, European Union and international level.

Information on infant formula

Breastfeeding is best for babies. All parents should know this. Breastfed babies have less risk of short and long-term illness. There are also health benefits for mothers who breastfeed.But if you have decided to use formula, for whatever reason, how do you decide which formula to use? Where do you find the information you need?

In this 4-part film, lasting less than 30 minutes, you can listen to Baby Milk Action's Campaigns and Networking Coordinator, Mike Brady, provide answers to these and other questions.

Part 1 is given above (if you cannot see the player, check you have Adobe Flashplayer installed). This covers: Department of Health on formula; composition of formula; claims that are companies can make about formula.

You will have to register to watch the following parts of the film (there is no charge to do so).

Part 2: The development of formula; putting risk in perspective; changes to formula composition; LCPs.

Part 3: Oligosaccharides ('Prebiotics'); how to choose between formulas; follow-on formula and Goodnight milks.

Part 4: Guidance on mixing up powdered formula to reduce risks.

If you have already registered and are logged in, click here for part 2.

To log in, click here. To register, click here. This will open a new window. Return to this window to continue using the above link.

Broadcast archive

Visit our old site for archived video and audio recordings - there are some real gems there, so please do take a look.

http://www.babymilkaction.org/ram/broadcasts.html

Problems with LCPs in the US. Updated 2011

2010 Update The safety of the ingredients - the US experience:  

EU and US block Thailand’s proposal to reduce sugar in baby foods

 

IBFAN press release

FAO/WHO Codex Nutrition Committee (CCFSNDU)

Chiang Mai, Thailand, 3rd November 2006

Cereal-based baby foods are an unlikely subject of controversy but this week they have been at the centre of a bitter struggle between health advocates and the multibillion dollar baby food industry whose interests were defended by the European Commission and the United States. The controversy centered on sugar levels and the rising levels of obesity and food related diseases which are fast consuming health budgets across the globe.

Download the attached pdf for the full press release.